dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
is simplified chinese actually simpler?
oh god. i am prepared for it not to be simple, but simpler, is that not a thing it achieves?
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
is simplified chinese actually simpler?
oh god. i am prepared for it not to be simple, but simpler, is that not a thing it achieves?