
mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze") wrote:
An essential dilemma of election security research is that activists and true believers selectively cherrypick findings to make unsupportable or misleading claims.
There *are* real vulnerabilities in many US election systems, and we have to discuss them in order to identify and mitigate them. But that isn't the same as saying that any election has been hacked or rigged (something there's no evidence of).
I don't know of any way to counter cherrypicking other than just telling the whole story.