Mastodon Feed
Boosted by mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze"):
mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze") wrote:
@AnnieG @ronnylam @jhavok @ApostateEnglishman There absolutely are vulnerabilities in much of the technology used in US elections, which is why things like RLAs should be routinely done. But the alarming-looking “evidence” from “ETA” just doesn’t show the “smoking gun” of fraud in 2024 that they claim it does. It’s sloppy pseudoscience at best, deliberate misinformation at worst.