baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
To throw a hypothetical example out there: a coding “agent” that generates working code half the time and 10% of all the code (working or not) is actively insecure will obviously be trash to most who test it
But an “agent” that generates working code 95% of the time while still having 10% odds of the code being insecure is a security catastrophe—a nightmare, not a productivity boon
It’s not a revolution but a crisis in the making