Mastodon Feed
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
I'll go first! CWV data *could* form the basis of at least a counter-argument about my assertions about which communities are leading to success more often:
https://lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/55bc8fad-44c2-4280-aa0b-5f3f0cd3d2be/page/M6ZPC
There are big methodological problems, of course, and we should be having a debate about how that will look when INP is included. But we aren't having that debate. Why not?