dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
i appear to have been porting smol's task abstraction to c for like an hour without really noticing.
i am tweaking as i do it, obviously.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
i appear to have been porting smol's task abstraction to c for like an hour without really noticing.
i am tweaking as i do it, obviously.