Boosted by aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart"):
mhoye@cosocial.ca wrote:
An argument I've been stewing on for a while is that the place stochastic language modelling will be most effective as a dowsing rod for _classes_ of both errors and overlooked needs and growth-paths. I think that @cwebber is partly correct but that attacker/defender is a reactive framing; not wrong, but: narrow.
We have a mirror here that can show us ourselves, reflected in patterns. What would we want to see if we could see anything? How would we change?