Mastodon Feed
Boosted by aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart"):
inthehands@hachyderm.io ("Paul Cantrell") wrote:
The article correctly notes:
❝The constitutional question of who authorised this war and the legal question of whether this strike constitutes a war crime were displaced by a technical question that is easier to ask and impossible to answer in the terms it set. The Claude debate absorbed the energy.❞
…but fails to recognize that this was part of the •point• of having Claude in the chain. This isn’t just the press missing the ball (though it is that). This is an evil system working as designed.
/end