Mastodon Feed
Boosted by mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze"):
mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze") wrote:
@worik @bzdev There is a mature body of work specifically on obtaining measurable and arbitrarily high confidence in (unreliable) computer-tallied election outcomes in a mathematically rigorous way. Google “Risk Limiting Audits” (see Stark’s work in particular). No need to re-invent this from scratch.