
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
jasongorman@mastodon.cloud ("Jason Gorman") wrote:
One argument I sometimes hear against trunk-based development is that the code may be changing rapidly, so it's better if developers work in isolation on their own branches.
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Surely it's the opposite? The faster the code's changing, the more often we should be merging?