Boosted by jwz:
dwineman@xoxo.zone ("Dan Wineman") wrote:
@jimray @anildash I think that framing has it a bit backwards. The *entire* reason this tech exists, and has essentially all of the available capital invested in it despite paltry revenue, is that it’s seen by wealthy dullards and psychopaths as a chance to destroy the value of creative and knowledge work; to enclose the “commons” of upward mobility through science and education (both of which they’re also actively working to destroy). It is anything but normal. https://circumstances.run/@davidgerard/115415020604832127