Reblogged by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
emilymbender@dair-community.social ("Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)") wrote:
This definitely makes it sound like they're misuing LLMs. As a reminder: papier-mache made out of good text is still papier-mache. It's not the result of someone using language to communicate something, it's not grounded a factual model of the world, and it sure as hell isn't journalism.
>>
Attachments:
- Screencap: Speeding up certain research and administrative portions of our workflow: CNET editors could use AI to help automate some portions of our work so we can focus on the parts that add the most unique value. This might include creating outlines of a given topic or analyzing written work to let us know if it's missing key themes or relevant context we can add. RAMP may also generate content such as explanatory material (based on trusted sources) that a human could fact-check and edit. Source: https://www.cnet.com/ai-policy/#ftag=MSF491fea7 (remote)