Mastodon Feed: Posts

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
QasimRashid ("Qasim Rashid, Esq.") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
walkerbragman@journa.host ("Walker Bragman") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
TheGuardian_us@newsrelay.org ("The Guardian US") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

oh, this is truly a mess if real

https://social.coop/@smallcircles/109574477805517827

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
nixCraft ("nixCraft 🐧") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by kornel ("Kornel"):
antimnguyen@mastodon.gamedev.place ("An-Tim Nguyen :gamedev:") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by lloydmeta ("Lloyd"):
epixoip@infosec.exchange ("Jeremi M Gosney :verified:") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by lloydmeta ("Lloyd"):
loic_d@framapiaf.org ("Loïc Descotte / Hell D.") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by lloydmeta ("Lloyd"):
WPalant@infosec.exchange ("Yellow Flag") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

rmrenner ("The Old Gay Gristle Fest") wrote:

My latest fort was really thriving until my dwarves followed a coal seam into a cavern full of troglodytes.

It turns out that hitting the "enemies off" option when you start a new fortress doesn't prevent them from spawning.

This probably wouldn't have been a huge problem except I haven't really learned much about setting up militia or medical stuff yet. RIP little guys

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by teller ("Siim Teller"):
cirriustech@infosec.exchange ("Graham Gold :donor:") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

teller ("Siim Teller") wrote:

Loved it. Love it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8JEm4d6Wu4

Mastodon Feed

nikvo@esperanto.masto.host wrote:

estas iomege malkuraĝiga kiam mi aǔskultas podkaston en la hispana, kiun mi provas lerni dum pli ol tri jaroj, kaj komprenas preskaǔ nenion

Mastodon Feed

lloydmeta ("Lloyd") wrote:

How Labelled HLists enable lens-like functionality with Path and writing structurally-typed functions that work with your normal everyday #rustlang structs.

Actually wrote this a while back but never shared on Mastodon.

https://beachape.com/blog/2021/05/25/structural-typing-in-rust

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
wood@federated.press ("Joshua Wood") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
linuxgal@techhub.social ("🌈 ☯️Teresita🐧👭") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
JennyLeeShee@mas.to ("Jenny Lee Shee") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by lloydmeta ("Lloyd"):
zak@infosec.exchange ("Zak Kaufman :1password:") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑"):
Supposenot ("SupposeNot") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑"):
preston@octodon.social ("Preston") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
mattblaze@federate.social ("Matt Blaze") wrote:

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by lloydmeta ("Lloyd"):
scottlougheed@hachyderm.io ("Scott Lougheed") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
relwalretep@mastodon.sdf.org ("Pete") wrote:

Mastodon Feed

pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:

Question: my wife got this from her father, who fought in WWII. Anyone know what these symbols represent?

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

fribbledom ("muesli") wrote:

Well, well, well. Let's find out if one of these emails actually work, because guess what:

I received a broken, rattling device 🙃

Mastodon Feed

jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

why am I so obsessed with anyURI, you say? why, because I am olde enough now to have seen far too many evil, stoopid, or just plain flabbergastingly weird things done with my code. deliberately or not…

and THAT is why I am so obsessed with getting anyURI tied down properly. and RTF.

sh*t, now I’m thinking about RTF too…

A Merry Fooking Christmas, to One and to All

Mastodon Feed

jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

and do not even talk to me about “rich text” fields quite yet, please. anyURI is such an admittedly sloppy fooking definition that dealing effectively with that in a reasonably fast and small footprint manner is quite enough to drive me mad for the moment, thankyouverymuch

proximity to “rich text” fields has been known to make my eye start twitching

Mastodon Feed

jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

for example: I do not think we want “file:” uris running around in the wild. for another example: uris can carry payloads which themselves…

see where this is going?

Mastodon Feed

fribbledom ("muesli") wrote:

It's important you only buy quality products from well established brands!

My USB meters? I refuse to buy anything but the trusted "Guang Zhou Zhu Zhi Ke Dian Zi Ke Ji You Xian Gong Si" from the world famous "Tianhequhuachengdadao3-7haosilouD6fang".

This label is just getting weirder and weirder with every line 😂

Attachments:

Mastodon Feed

jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

why am I obsessing about building a decent anyURI object, you ask? well…

it seems to me that there are usually a few key points in a system where it is *really* important to tightly define what can happen, a few key points through which most of the attempts at doing evil sh*t with my work must flow. and in implementing a spec like ActivityPub, one of those points is when a uri is (re)created, because… well, it is Webbish.