Do you know "Red Means Recording"? Fun demo of a quirky tool, and nice tunes:
Reblogged by technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see..."):
mathowie@xoxo.zone ("Matt Haughey 🦣") wrote:
Attachments:
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
miami beach is ridiculously photogenic
Attachments:
- A bright and sunny street under a clear blue sky. On the far side are bright white hotels, the closest with yellow accents (remote)
- Art Deco lifeguard tower in hot pink, with bright colored accents all over (remote)
- A beach scene, with white sand under a clear blue sky and a line of pink umbrellas casting shadows (remote)
- Old-timey yellow car in front of an Art Deco building labeled "Avalon" (remote)
Reblogged by technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see..."):
vogon ("yves adele fartlow") wrote:
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
For a spider guy, teaching a fly genetics lab is like having a vampire run a public school. Yum yum.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/01/24/rapacity/
Attachments:
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
i will endure some hardships in my preference for public transit over private cars but sometimes it's just the best option on every axis and car-heads don't even know
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
spent the weekend in miami (for my first ever visit!) and out of stubbornness insisted on using public transit the whole time. certainly some pain points but WOW was the 150 express bus from MIA to South Beach so clearly the best option for that leg
Gargron ("Eugen Rochko") wrote:
Checking out @ivory!
Reblogged by pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑"):
pshread@masto.ai ("Paul Shread") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
joshbressers ("Josh Bressers") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
drvolts@journa.host ("david roberts") wrote:
Attachments:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
Margarita ("Margarita Noriega") wrote:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
peter@area51.social ("Peter Mount") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
juddlegum@journa.host ("Judd Legum") wrote:
Time for some new music in your timeline!
I finally got around to listen to the music of "Goth Dad" and I really enjoy it. :batsquish:Vision Video - In My Side
https://song.link/s/1FgOjbd5YinVDboy7Ul5Jw#music #NowPlaying #VisionVideo #goth #GothicRock #PostPunk #NewWave #GothPop
Reblogged by lcasdev ("Luca Casonato 🏳️🌈"):
deno_land@fosstodon.org ("Deno") wrote:
Attachments:
Reblogged by blithe ("Blithe"):
ivory@tapbots.social ("Ivory") wrote:
Attachments:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
ifixcoinops@mstdn.social ("Dan Fixes Coin-Ops") wrote:
Go get it! https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ivory-for-mastodon-by-tapbots/id6444602274
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
I'm contemplating traveling by train this summer. The US doesn't make it easy to figure out what is possible, though.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/01/24/any-train-people-out-there/
Attachments:
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
Got set up on @ivory and signed up for an annual subscription. So far it's great, congrats and good luck to @tapbots
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
We've been developing out ahead of artificially denied consensus for a decade, and Apple implementing many of these designs w/o changes today is an admission that all the trolling and side-eye was just that: marketing to cover for a lack of care and investment -- not a real or accurate commentary about quality.
We'll always engage with Apple (and anyone else) in standards, but the idea that somehow things must move slower, or that Apple is being more responsible here, is thoroughly rubbished.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
But this also points out a separate quality axis that used to be fused to the standards process in the old wild, wild west. Once upon a time, it was ship-and-fix-in-standards, but that's not how it works now. We do all the quality assurance work *before* shipping.
Not only is it possible to design features responsibly, in the open, with extremely high quality, great security, & privacy, but to do so well ahead of (gamed) consensus.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
So it's important to view the manufactured opacity and disengagement from Apple as a tactic: by withholding engineering bandwidth in standards, it can prevent responsibly designed features from migrating to more "official" standards bodies which provide the cover of more consensus.
When you don't want to fund the work, and the gate is consensus, you can spend a *lot* less to dam the standards river and muddy the water downstream. And Apple does.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
The Blink API OWNERS discuss and vote on these features, in the open, and our tie-breaker is "do we have evidence that this solves an important problem well?"
That isn't a discussion about other vendors; it's about end-users and end-developers.
Here's a talk I gave about the incredibly open, risk-based approach we take:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z83L6xa1tw
What you should understand is that every Blink developer feels like they're wading through molasses to navigate this gauntlet. The bar is HIGH.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
What does that look like?
There's an arduous process that we make feature teams walk to launch. The result is that features must be developed *responsibly*, and in the open.
If we're going to take the risk to put something into the platform in an area where Apple (et al) are radio silent (which is a LOT of the web), the bar goes way up to ship. Specs. Tests. Explainers. Developer feedback. All of it is required:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
PlayHistory@oldbytes.space ("Play History") wrote:
Attachments:
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
The worst misunderstanding is the idea that Chromium is "shipping proprietary features" that Apple et al are protecting the web from.
Obviously, I'm biased, but this is usually a case of Apple withholding engagement in standards fora, which denies feature teams a browser partner to move things forward, but that's not the constituency for features; developers and users are.
So we work around radio silence by Apple by demanding care and evidence, rather than standing dead in the water.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
IDK who needs to hear this, but Safari is not a "counterbalance to Chrome", it's actively gutting Mozilla of revenue while simultaneously holding the web back through structural under-investment.
Some of y'all are cheering Apple as they measure the web for a casket because you don't like the insurance plan it's on today:
https://infrequently.org/2022/06/apple-is-not-defending-browser-engine-choice/
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
almost no spelling error (by others) gets on my nerves — if meaning is clear spelling is definitely secondary. except "mastadon" for some reason