pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
I don't know why I bother to read the news, no action will ever be taken on the information.
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
I don't know why I bother to read the news, no action will ever be taken on the information.
Reblogged by xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins"):
brion@bikeshed.vibber.net ("Brion Vibber") wrote:
xor@tech.intersects.art ("Parker Higgins") wrote:
The only roguelike that ever really captured my imagination was ffmpeg
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
toxi@mastodon.thi.ng ("Karsten Schmidt") wrote:
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Don't touch it! It's probably an EVIL meatball!
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/03/28/behold-the-resurrected-mammoth/
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
freakazoid@retro.social ("AnarchistSpaceDad") wrote:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
mhoye wrote:
cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen") wrote:
Depeche Mode released a new album, "Memento Mori", on the 24th and it's available on Bandcamp:
https://depechemode.bandcamp.com/album/memento-mori
h/t @ieure
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Elon Musk hasn't yet figured out that a blue check mark is worth negative $24 billion.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/03/28/genius-investor/
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
jessica_drossin@masto.nu ("Jessica Drossin") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
owa ("Open Web Advocacy") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
tomayac@toot.cafe ("Thomas Steiner :chrome:") wrote:
isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
By the way, I did start on the thing. Going okay so far, but so many small things to wade through :-) The abstract concept in your brain has a luxury to not care of that, but the code has to.
technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see...") wrote:
tryin' to remember that post I saw where one person was like
> elon bought twitter and now people are pretending like that site was ever good?
and then
> well it's like if you found a turd in a urinal. sure it was a toilet but that's not the right kind of toilet for what happened here.
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
willoremus ("Will Oremus") wrote:
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
morachbeag@aus.social wrote:
pzmyers@octodon.social ("pzmyers 🦑") wrote:
Place the blame appropriately.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/03/27/view-from-the-other-side/
Reblogged by blithe ("Blithe"):
rochers ("Scott Rocher") wrote:
isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:") wrote:
@fribbledom as soon as it will be able to "realize" anything for itself it probably would decide that there's no point in creating any of it.
Reblogged by isagalaev ("Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:"):
kizu@front-end.social ("Roma Komarov") wrote:
Just waiting for ChatGPT to spit out architecture-specific binaries directly, because it realizes that the entire source code generation and compilation step is kinda unnecessary for a non-human entity like itself.
Reblogged by anathema@girlcock.club:
cmconseils ("Laura Manach :bongoCat:") wrote:
Reblogged by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your friendly 'net denizen"):
s0@cathode.church ("s0 wants more terabytes") wrote:
Reblogged by slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell"):
48kRAM@oldbytes.space wrote:
"Excessive architecture" in programming, such as most of the "SOLID" practices I've seen (every class has an interface "just in case") is a worse form of "premature optimisation" (nevermind how out-of-context that quote is taken) than performance tuning.
Hate hate hate. Interfaces with a single implementor shouldn't exist.
OOP programmers should feel bad for the mess they have orchestrated.
jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:
"The closing of the Observer raises questions about whether small progressive publications can survive the digital transformation of journalism and the information ecosystem during a time of rapid social, demographic and technological change."
https://texasobserver.social/@TexasObserver/110093148980077491
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
TexasObserver@texasobserver.social ("Texas Observer") wrote:
Reblogged by jeffsonstein ("Jeff Sonstein"):
mshelton ("Martin") wrote:
technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see...") wrote:
it's called GPT-4 because they've finally reached stage 4 of Simulacra and Simulation
> The fourth stage is pure simulacrum, in which the simulacrum has no relationship to any reality whatsoever. Here, signs merely reflect other signs and any claim to reality on the part of images or signs is only of the order of other such claims. This is a regime of total equivalency, where cultural products need no longer even pretend to be real in a naïve sense, because the experiences of consumers' lives are so predominantly artificial that even claims to reality are expected to be phrased in artificial, "hyperreal" terms. Any naïve pretension to reality as such is perceived as bereft of critical self-awareness, and thus as oversentimental.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulacra_and_Simulation#Stages
technomancy@icosahedron.website ("tech? no! man, see...") wrote:
#trekposting with some more r/StarTrekMemes gems