Mastodon Feed: Posts

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

shelfy mc shelf face

Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
freebooters.uk.spacevirgins@rss-parrot.net ("🦜 Space Virgins: First Contact") wrote:

Chris's new system for rating films is crap, but Esoteric Ebb is a really good game

freebooters.uk/media/20260510-freebooters-esoteric-ebb.mp3

Chris proposed a 'banded' tier system for rating films, before chatting about Esoteric Ebb and how ours games played out.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

the problem with fried egg butties is it's hard to not have the second one

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
mttaggart@infosec.exchange ("Taggart :ifin:") wrote:

The constant mental vigilance in a generative world is exhausting.

"I asked Claude to do $thing and it did this!"

No it didn't. No you didn't. Probably none of that happened.

And somehow, being unwilling to admit the thing is just making stuff up is annoying and unnecessary, not the damn model.

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
moriel@chaosfem.tw ("Moriel 🏳️‍⚧️") wrote:

Well here's something that doesn't surprise me in the least.

People with similar levels of autistic traits show greater social attraction to one another, and their brains synchronize in unique ways during active conversation. A recent experiment published in Biological Psychiatry suggests that social difficulties related to autism might be a problem of mismatched communication styles rather than an inherent social deficit.

This matches with our own life experience very well. It is much easier for us to be social with other autistics than to do so with neurotypical people.

https://www.psypost.org/brain-scans-reveal-how-people-with-autistic-traits-connect-differently/

#Autism #ASD

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
fesshole ("Fesshole 🧻") wrote:

I opened a package while walking through the park and signed because I'd accidentally bought a dozen whistles instead of just one. A kid asked why I sighed and I explained. She then asked for the other eleven. I wonder what a five y/o did with eleven really loud whistles.

Boosted by aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart"):
redsad@ohai.social ("captain acab :antifa:") wrote:

🙃

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

BTW if you have excitedly updated the #PyConUS iPhone app for 2026 and been greeted with a crash to a black screen, much like each year requires a new login on their website, apparently each year's state is incompatible with the previous. Delete the app, reinstall it from the app store, and it should work fine.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

i have just pointed it at an elixir project and told it to do something. it's decided the best way is to ignore it and write a python script 😂

aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart") wrote:

Periodic reminder that “rate your pain on a scale from 1 to 10" is bullshit without reference points. People with chronic pain, tough guys, people with intense periods, and people who struggle with interoception all struggle when the endpoints are nebulous.

Let me introduce you to the DVPRS: https://www.va.gov/WHOLEHEALTHLIBRARY/docs/Defense-and-Veterans-Pain-Rating-Scale.pdf

It even works if you substitute pain for general impact. If you're asked to rate a symptom on a scale from 1 to 10, this works too.

0 = No pain
1 = Hardly notice pain
2 = Notice pain, does not interfere with activities
3 = Sometimes distracts me
4 = Distracts me, can do usual activities
5 = Interrupts some activities
6 = Hardto ignore, avoid usual activities
7 = Focus of attention, prevents doing daily activities
8 = Awful, hard to do anything
9 = Can’t bear the pain, unable to do anything
10 = As bad as it could be, nothing else matters

10 is still pretty subjective there, but "nothing else matters" is clear enough, and really 9 or 10 isn't really a big difference in how much it matters clinically. (It tells the clinician if an intervention helps though)

fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:

It's okay Hank Green told us there's nothing to worry about because of reasons

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/08/georgia-data-centers-water-00909988

aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart") wrote:

RE: https://mastodon.social/@ricmac/116546044758804988

LOL.

But also yes, this.

It's WILD to see LLMs driving us back toward some honestly better practices.

It's like the cognitive and process overheads of our fat stacks are measurable when you count tokens.

Boosted by aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart"):
GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social wrote:

The purpose of these systems is disallowing people from using hardware and software not approved by Apple or Google. This is wrongly presented as being a security feature. Banks and government services are the main ones adopting it but Apple and Google are encouraging every service to use it.

pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers 🕷") wrote:

Have you called your mother?

https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/05/10/mothers-day-matters/

Boosted by jwz:
pmonks@sfba.social ("pmonks (330ppm)") wrote:

Just got into it with some idiot about taxing billionaires, and their argument basically boiled down to “governments are corrupt, so the tax revenue won’t be used properly.” 🙄

Bitch please. My main interest is in making sure billionaires can’t exist. We could literally set the money we collect on fire and it would still achieve that goal. Using some of it for good things is just icing on the mf’ing cake!!

#USPol #TaxTheRich

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

oh my god you guys, i actually read one of these AGENTS.md files and it's hilarious 😂

Use Tailwind CSS classes and custom CSS rules to create polished, responsive, and visually stunning interfaces

Always manually write your own tailwind-based components instead of using daisyUI for a unique, world-class design

Produce world-class UI designs with a focus on usability, aesthetics, and modern design principles

it's like giving it aspirations 😂

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

and this is where i'm stuck, because it literally can't even just reproduce the code it's not editing verbatim. how am i supposed to get close enough to the promised nirvana of it writing and editing code that i can kid myself it's less than a waste of time? without writing a million tests that basically assert that it hasn't deleted all the code it broke inadvertently, that is.

maybe i should put the error back (i had to check it line by line, sigh) and see what it does to fix it?

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
xgranade@wandering.shop ("Cassandra is only carbon now") wrote:

Trying to test whether what @glyph is seeing is a Mastodon thing or a statistical anomaly.

Please vote on whichever answer causes the current results to change the most, and share widely.

https://wandering.shop/@xgranade/116551741589708709

aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart") wrote:

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

i have learned so much already, like:

• running models on your own hardware is a lot of effort
• sandboxing an agent properly is a lot of effort
• my hardware isn't really good enough for most models
• javascript software builds have somehow gotten even worse than i remember them being

but more importantly, i think i've finally worked out what 'prompt engineering' is.

i had, preferring to not touch any of this shit with a bargepole, laboured under the illusion that prompt engineering was about producing better code.

from my admittedly limited experience so far, prompt engineering is more about:

1. making it less fucking annoying. be concise. no, more concise. stop with the walls of text. what are you even fucking doing? that sort of thing.
2. getting it to check there were no errors in its extrusion process, like the one i've just watched it introduce into some code it didn't need to touch.

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

can we just take a moment to appreciate this little gem it's just given me?

Understood. Sloppiness will be eliminated.

Boosted by jwz:
atax1a@infosec.exchange ("mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)") wrote:

RE: https://infosec.exchange/@atax1a/110290356664884710

yeah gee i wonder if anyone could have predicted this

Boosted by jwz:
inthehands@hachyderm.io ("Paul Cantrell") wrote:

SCOTUS: Racism is in the past!

CONFEDERATE SLAVE STATES: Cool, now we can finally disenfranchise all the Black people

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

Is agentic coding the future of software development?

Boosted by jwz:
spaf@mstdn.social wrote:

sky@schub.social ("Sky Schubert") wrote:

it kinda saddens me that matrix was the most painful service to switch usernames in - because that's just not a thing. you have to start over with a new account, effectively. :(

even IRC (well, at least libera) has better support, where you can add new-nick to your nickname group, change your account name, and that's pretty much it - all access levels will just be magically adjusted.

oh well.

Boosted by jwz:
kaye@cathode.church ("Kaye") wrote:

I had a dream that Mozilla were bullied into including a toggle in Firefox that disables all the corpo bullshit (so no tracking, ads, AI, etc.) but they were really pissy about it so they called it "communism mode" and you had to click on a little Karl Marx to activate it

Boosted by ChrisWere@toot.wales ("Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕"):
chris@video.thepolarbear.co.uk ("Chris Were but on PeerTube") wrote:

Chris's new system for rating films is crap, but Esoteric Ebb is a really good game

https://video.thepolarbear.co.uk/w/o8Wsn5pMsKNhFQ8HX4nnxB

pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers 🕷") wrote:

Pentecostal religion + UFOs + Rapture + racism + birtherism --> terminal brain rot.

https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/05/10/gigo/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37FQQdqvgCE

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
hllizi@hespere.de ("Dieu") wrote:

@gabrielesvelto when they took down half the Internet twice with just a little break in between I suspected AI shenanigans to be the cause, and maybe I wasn't the only one. Announcing now to fire the people who might correct the next mess may not be reassuring.