dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
Our algorithm always reduces the amount of memory and reached improvements upto less than a tenth.
I think I know what you're saying, but that doesn't seem like a good way to phrase it
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
Our algorithm always reduces the amount of memory and reached improvements upto less than a tenth.
I think I know what you're saying, but that doesn't seem like a good way to phrase it