dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
i just read the lobsters discussion on the new codeberg LLM policy and LLM users are upset.
I suspect that forbidding projects which use LLMs to produce code will seem as strange in twenty years as forbidding projects which use high-level languages strikes us all now.
IT'S JUST A COMPILER BRO!
What the authors of this post don't seem to realize is that it is possible to care about software while maintaining and developing it with the help of LLMs.
it's not the common case though is it?
It's unfortunate to see Codeberg position itself against entropy, but it will at least be interesting to see how many of these decisions are walked back over the next decade.
yes, i'm sure that will be the likely outcome rather than the bubble popping 😂
From Ghostty to Redis, rsync to Linux kernel, more and more FOSS projects are taking advantage of various AI tools in a responsible manner and forcing them to stay on GitHub is just unfortunate and backward in my opinion.
oh yes, it's actually a secret plot to keep github popular 😬