Mastodon Feed: Post

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

somebody in a chat asked us what we did about DOES>, a few weeks ago

Evocation does not have an equivalent to DOES>, not for any principled reason, just because we didn't know about it. it had been on our back burner to figure out, for some time.

anyway we went and read about it now and we understand how it's implemented. we don't think we actually have a use for it, heh.