Mastodon Feed
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
olivia@scholar.social ("Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ") wrote:
> Computational models in psychology are typically judged by a single standard: empirical fit. [However, it's] misleading as a sole criterion, as the same result can arise [in] different situations: theoretically faithful models, mathematically flexible ones, miscalibrated operationalizations...
👇🏼
Chuang, Y., & Guest, O. (2026). Beyond Empirical Success: Evaluating Theoretical Virtue Across the Computational Modeling Chain. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22708906