Mastodon Feed
Boosted by jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)"):
andreasthom@mathstodon.xyz ("Andreas Thom") wrote:
3/3 Sellke’s categorical answer was, at minimum, unjustifiably broad and materially misleading; looking back it was plainly dishonest. Bubeck’s acknowledged attacks and his attempt to exclude Alpöge from a proposed OpenAI-proof paper deepen the concern that there is a loss of moral compass. Taken together, this raises serious questions about their judgment and personal integrity.