Mastodon Feed
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
ubernostrum@infosec.exchange ("James Bennett") wrote:
So. I now have a few months' more experience with LLMs than I did when I wrote that post and everyone said I just needed more experience with LLMs. And my opinion has not become any more favorable.
The bottleneck still is not speed of code generation, and even if it did become the bottleneck, LLMs would not be a silver bullet for it because of the code quality issues that they continue to have and that have been widely reported in the literature across multiple generations of "oh, those older ones were bad, but THIS time it's the revolutionary leap" claims.
Put simply: the work that I am doing right now would probably be going *faster* if no LLM had ever been involved in the process.