Mastodon Feed
Boosted by NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️🌈"):
49016@catgirl.cloud ("⬡-49016 :neobot_box_cat_ears:") wrote:
actually. you've gotta hand it to werner koch: gpg has zero vulnerabilities under wk's definition: every gpg invocation requires social engineering (into using gpg in the first place because nobody in their right mind would voluntarily use gpg on their own) hence making all 'vulnerabilities' a social engineering issue and not a technical vulnerability that needs to be fixed in code