Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
zzt@mas.to ("[object Object]") wrote:
if LLMs are just AI tools that are safe in the hands of experts, then a ban only ensures you’ll get the quality you claim exists
if they’re just tools then banning LLMs is like banning emacs: if you don’t spew config noise across the repo (and you really shouldn’t for most projects) and your output isn’t fucked up in some identifiable way, then nobody will know what you’re using
if on the other hand I’m right, then banning LLMs is the only sane choice if you’d like to keep doing FOSS at all