Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
mawhrin@circumstances.run ("flere-imsaho 🇺🇦") wrote:
there's not many things that get me going so fast as hearing that LLMs are useful as accessibility tools.
they aren't. where they somehow work, they are at best adequate. and it's never done with accessibility as a main goal, usually just something half made-up to make the detractors shut up.
now imagine what we could have, if a promille of a promille, one-millionth of the money put into the autoconfabulators was spent on fucking actually developing accessibility tools.