Mastodon Feed
Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip (":privTri: Volpeon :areonNSmol:") wrote:
I find it exhausting how some people think that if a stricter type uncovers potential problems, they need to trick the type checker into accepting the unsafe code instead of fixing the code so the problem doesn't exist.