Mastodon Feed
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
“What Bun Can Tell Us About AI, Open Source and Anthropic – tecosystems”
https://redmonk.com/sogrady/2026/06/04/bun-two-lessons/
So, I keep track of what some of the usual analysts in tech are saying and most of the time it's flawed but internally coherent
But this one is weird. All those words about Bun and "AI" and not one mention of Zig’s LLM policy or other context to bun’s hasty transition to rust?
How is that not a core part of anybody’s analysis of Bun, pro- or anti-“AI”?