Mastodon Feed: Post

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by neatnik@social.lol ("Neatnik :prami:"):
Yuvalne@433.world ("Talya (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️✡️") wrote:

#Fediblock ieji.de: admins allow for antisemitism and trollish defence of Nazism under the pretext of "free speech".
attached: screenshots of the offending posts, CW antisemitism, Nazism, mention of sexual violence, and of conversation with the main admin where they explain they're not gonna take any action.

archives of reported posts:
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/pHWOU
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/8muuL

#FediAntisemitism

post from someone who's not me: @Yuvalne@433.world @skyblitz@ieji.de if it looks like a duck, talks like a duck, and steps like a goose, Maya @skyblitz@ieji.de @[that someone] @Yuvalne@433.world yeah condemn all the innocent all those fool have called nazi, becaune by chance one on them was a nazi ... good thinking metod i see. So i say you are a nazi, and by your logic you are because ... this one was one.
post from me: @skyblitz @kde yes, doing blatant antisemitism, promoting rape and indentifying with Nazis, as svin did, are the sort of things that tend to get you called a Nazi. Maya @skyblitz@ieji.de @Yuvalne @kde yeaaah stop your genocide before talking about anticemitism
DM chain from me to @SolSoCoG. me: hi, can i ask why no action has been taken against this post that clearly violates your server rules? ieji.de/@skyblitz/117332935203761270 or this one ieji.de/@skyblitz/117332939734297724 me, a day later: so... any action? this report has been standing for a while now, i DM'd you directly. is your server unmoderated?
SolSoCoG: it is not, no, I have checked it and see borderline content. Not nice at all but heated conversations are allowed i see no direct attacks sorry if I misread something here. me: so defending the Nazi svin (who was banned from KDE for Nazism) is borderline content? and equating Jews with the state of Israel, which is a form of antisemitism, is borderline content? SolSoCoG: several mods concluded that the messages are questionable but not actionable, heated wording but not punishable, very much unethical, vicious whataboutism, yes. But a heavy lapse of judgement in an discussion is fine if its not the accounts main goal to be for example antisemitic. From our point of view the replies are not unlawful and covered under freedom of speech.