Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
jasongorman@mastodon.cloud ("Jason Gorman") wrote:
But even if you *could* make quality gates good enough that you won't need to review the code - and good luck with that - you then run straight into another trap: comprehension debt.
LLMs will never be reliable enough that you won't need to understand the code. That's physics.