Mastodon Feed
Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
dreid@wandering.shop wrote:
Part of the point of open source is reuse. And wholesale copying can be valid. But that reuse has always had boundaries and constraints applied to it.
Attribution, open sourcing of modifications, etc.
Thats what the licenses are there for.
If we're saying licenses shouldn't matter then ok that's an argument we can have.
But the "clean room implementation of a thing in the training data" people still seem to think licenses matter or they wouldn't have had to relicense anything.