Mastodon Feed
ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:
looking at it again today, things feel clearer. we stubbed out the "messy" but more-direct approach, and we've seen what its very rough output would look like and what work would be needed to make it solid, and it feels wrong. we're going with the other approach, the special comment syntax at the point where output-generating words are defined.