Mastodon Feed
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
conservancy have written a thing again.
it's an incredibly mixed bag.
The FOSS community should support, not just tolerate, those who outright reject LLM-gen-AI systems.
yes, yes absolutely.
No one should be required to use these systems under duress.
definitely
FOSS projects should not shun contributors who choose to use LLM-gen-AI systems.
what?
Avoid jumping to conclusions about the legal significance of generated contributions and whether they are “copyright-washing-machines that ruin copyleft”.
are you for real?
When LLM-gen-AI systems (including proprietary ones) can massively accelerate FOSS improvements, use of such tools is an appropriate strategic compromise.
do you understand what 'improvement' means?