Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof: :Nonbinary:"):
whitequark@treehouse.systems ("✧✦Catherine✦✧") wrote:
@devilslattice a number of things including but not limited to:
- expressing design intent
- verifying that specific workflows work as expected
- verifying that specific failure modes occur as expected
- controlling for regressions
but not including:
- describing how the current implementation happens to work without any input from its designers
(except in cases where you have a legacy system you're trying to replace and have to reproduce its behavior exactly, which is not the case here or pretty much anywhere else this AI-produced garbage would be posted.)