Mastodon Feed
Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof: :Nonbinary:"):
glyph ("Glyph") wrote:
@davidgerard @chroma I don't agree with everything in the video, but what makes it "bad advice"? The harm-reduction approach that she is advocating has been empirically validated for harmful behaviors in general (plenty of literature on substance abuse) but also specifically for AI.
Do you have any countervailing data?
There's also a big difference between AI *advocates* and AI users. Harm reduction doesn't apply to the dealers.