dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
i've been thinking about c-ish syntax and it's really really hard to imagine the type of dependent functions not sucking to write. particularly when you start factoring in things like implicits
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
i've been thinking about c-ish syntax and it's really really hard to imagine the type of dependent functions not sucking to write. particularly when you start factoring in things like implicits