dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
okay fine littlegem will be garbage collected. i suppose we'll aim to dispel the myth that garbage collected languages can't compete with c on performance then.
dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:
okay fine littlegem will be garbage collected. i suppose we'll aim to dispel the myth that garbage collected languages can't compete with c on performance then.