jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:
The website is misleading in a way is skillful and subtle - the way you would think things would work is that the simulation actually worked at the task level, like actually having a mixture of tasks modeled within a worker. Thats a very different kind of model than the macro model they've done here. The thing in the paper is a lot more like "let's construct an equation that always goes up" than "let's simulate what the world could work like and observe the results"