Mastodon Feed
Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net ("Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:") wrote:
OK. I've skimmed the decision (35 pages). This is NOT based on the EU AI act. The court sees the "AI Summaries" that Google produces as content created and published by Google, hence they are liable when their work produces wrong and harmful statements, as was the case here. So quite a normal decision. Google's argument that they are somehow exempted failed. They have to remove the wrong statements and pay 80% of the costs.