Mastodon Feed: Posts

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase"):
ah@goto.boserup.eu ("asta, festering bloodflame") wrote:

Mastodon had its first assisted commit a few days ago! Welcome to the board, Mastodon.

I think nixpkgs is the project I track where I search through the most commits. I go through 296,500 to find 492 labelled as assisted.

I think rsync is the project with the largest percentage of assisted commits. It was touching 50% back in April. That project seems kind of dead.

The same pattern of mostly assisted activity seems to apply to Deno but on a larger scale.

Mesa had an absolutely glorious day on 7 June where someone went ham on "r600/sfn". All yellow. Every single one of the almost 60 commits labelled as assisted.

PipeWire has the same pattern on 27 April where they seemingly did some security analysis.

Mastodon Feed

NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️‍🌈") wrote:

In "normal" (non-tiling) mode, it's very easy to use keyboard shortcuts to reposition a window to a half or quarter of the screen.

One feature I'd love: A keyboard shortcut to position a window in the middle 50% of a screen (using all vertical space).

When I manually position windows, I usually do this for my main application, and have other apps partially visible behind it to the left/right for easily tabbing between them. (Tools like Divvy let you do this on macOS.)

Mastodon Feed

NfNitLoop ("Cody Casterline 🏳️‍🌈") wrote:

If you use #Linux and haven't yet tried #Cosmic desktop, I recommend it!

A windowing bug in the desktop I'd been using pushed me to look for alternatives. Not only did Cosmic not suffer from the same bug, but the default window management shortcuts are quite nice in both tiling and "normal" modes.

Window "stacks" let you create a single window where each tab is a *different application*, which is super handy when your workflow requires looking at X and (Y or Z).

A screnshot example of Cosmic Desktop window "stacks". The screenshot is just a thin slice covering the top of a window stack. Across the top are tabs for Librewolf, Steam, and Ghostty (in ~/code/iroh). The currently selected window for the stack is Librewolf, so below that, Librewolf's tabs are shown.

Mastodon Feed

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

RE: https://mastodon.social/@glyph/116384233456335427

nobody has done this yet so I remain convinced that they are, in fact, cowards

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by kornel ("Kornel"):
redsad@ohai.social ("captain acab :antifa: 🏳️‍🌈") wrote:

#Caturday #meme

two cats laying on an seat, the white one is labeled Chile and is being squished all skinny into the back of the seat by the black one. the black one is spread out to normal size and is labeled Argentina.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by kornel ("Kornel"):
falkowata@toot.wales ("Kat") wrote:

Is this even a cat
#caturday

Close up on a cat sleeping on his back with paws on the air

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

use a yagi-udon antenna for the tastiest picture on food programmes

Mastodon Feed

jwz wrote:

Nuclear option.

I have a single AWS instance, with a static IP, not behind a load balancer or CloudFront. How do I block all of Hong Kong? I gather the answer has something to do with WAF but I don't understand.

Please use small words, URLs, and assume that I have no idea what any of the acronyms you used mean.

DO NOT answer questions I did not ask.

https://jwz.org/b/yk9K

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

dogs have tail call optimisation - they can go round and round chasing their tail in the same space

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

spherical horse

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

retracting the landing gear while the plane was still on the tarmac

😂

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
futurebird@sauropods.win ("myrmepropagandist") wrote:

Sometimes when people run a forum or even on social media the long time participants will notice that they answer the same questions over and over and over... this may lead to forum rules that ban posts that are repeats of old questions.

I think this is almost always a mistake if you are trying to build a community. It's helpful and good to link to similar older posts, but nothing makes a community feel insular than being told none of your questions are new and RTFM.

1/

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

Variable fonts are 🆒😎

https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Datatype?preview.script=Latn

Mastodon Feed

dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase") wrote:

germany's answer to the spice girls

cringing for germany rn

Mastodon Feed

aredridel@kolektiva.social ("Mx. Aria Stewart") wrote:

For those that don't know, I help run a large women in technology chat group on Slack. It's been going for 11 years now! (ask me for an invite if you want one and that's appropriate!)

It has deeply shaped how I think about technology, especially the social side. There is so much embodied knowledge in that community, it's amazing. And it's also such a window into how much the mainstream of technology writing is dominated by men. We talk about it differently! We're much more likely to be critical, and to be critical of the _structures_ in tech. Sometimes that comes off as kneejerk "Ugh BRIAN!" to some of the bullshit men to do women in the workplace, but also embedded underneath is an understanding of rarely-mapped power structures in the field. So much advice out there is written assuming that there is no dissent, no silent frustration, no quiet abandoning the job when the pressures are unresolved. And so much of the tech world, press and on social media alike, has no insight that this attrition even happens.

Women, collectively, though, understand it. We notice the patterns of promotions. We understand the way that if we're in our 40s, we're rather likely to have a manager who is a decade younger than we are, with no particular experience. We notice when men are lauded for spending time with their family instead of work on occasion, but women are expected to be present at all times and rarely seen positively for doing the exact same things.

And yet, any given instance is always shrouded in deniability. The pattern generally holds, but is this one my fault? Do I not measure up? Or is it sexism?

That's what these structures rob from us: we never have the clarity in feedback that it is accurate, that is us that must change. When we stick to our guns, are we being obstinate, or are we correct? That information is denied to us by sexism. It only becomes clear in aggregate, and even then it is very hard to find action to take on it except to acknowledge it and move on.

I don't think people talk about that ambiguity enough: we're always looking for the clear sexism, the man speaking over the women, the trading sexual favors for advancement, the clear pattern of pet-to-threat that so many women experience as they age or gain skill in the field. But the bulk of sexism that we experience is in the structural poisoning of feedback.

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

Apple can't convince anyone who has used a smartphone in anger or tried to build an app to support their 30% vig -- nevermind the crimes against open computing needed to enable it. Instead, they sock-puppet this org to the tune of tens of millions every year.

And look, I'm not going to begrudge anyone a tech wage -- pots, kettles, etc. -- but you have to hope $300-600K/yr lets these folks sleep well at night, having spent all day selling real developers down the river:

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/522106531#:~:text=%2419%2C843%2C802-,Compensation,-Key%20Employees%20and

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

You can tell that these people are entirely full of shit because they never, ever bite the hand that feeds. And boy howdy, does it [7].

Apple's even funneling money through them as a PAC [8] to buy off legislators, and ham-fistedly laundering it through staff [9].

[7]: https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/522106531
[8]: https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/association-for-competitive-technology/C00353284/summary/2024
[9]: https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/act-the-app-assn/C00353284/donors/2024

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

@owa @pluralistic The history is entertaining.

Initially set up by a former DoE scientist who was done for espionage,[1] ACT used to be a front group for Microsoft in the naughties [2]. Today, as far as anyone can tell, ACT is wholly owned subsidiary of Apple Legal [3].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart%5FNozette
[2]: https://publicintegrity.org/politics/microsoft-heavily-funding-small-business-lobby/
[3]: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-19/apple-flexes-muscle-as-quiet-power-behind-app-developer-group

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

Regulators around the world have been getting the view from the spaceship in stereo; once from Apple's silver tongues, and in less articulate form from ACT, who try to pose as salt-of-the-earth developers [4]. Who *doesn't* want to take tech advice from wellness grifters [5] and FedSoc hacks [6]?

Wild to see them veering into territory that so thoroughly blows their cover.

[4]: https://actonline.org/staff/
[5]: https://medium.com/@mikesax/about-wellbeyond-197835b3d5d2
[6]: https://fedsoc.org/bio/graham-dufault

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
fringemagnet@sunny.garden ("Annie Hsh 👾🖖☕") wrote:

The negative backlash over Meta's new feature that allowed anyone to use someone's personal photos and likeness to generate AI content without even notifying them (which had automatically opted in all public Instagram accounts of anyone over 18) was so overwhelming that they are removing it just a few days after it was introduced.

Sure, sneaky practices to normalise AI slop and the use of people's data without explicit consent aren't disappearing overnight, but this is a win regardless. It's also a reminder that "it's the future, it's inevitable, we should embrace it" is plain false.

Nobody, even those who made AI Ghibli avatars or generate 2 sentence response emails through ChatGPT not knowing (or caring) about all the negatives, wants their images, and the faces of themselves and their family to be fair game and their privacy to be violated. Maliciousness on the internet is not a new thing, but features like that give bad actors new tools to spread false info, create revenge porn, discredit, humiliate and target anyone, especially women and marginalised groups. How we react to them sets a precedent for the future.

https://deadline.com/2026/07/meta-removes-muse-image-ai-feature-backlash-1236979605/

#Meta #MetaAI #Instagram #AI #Privacy #OnlineSafety

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
nik@nkantar.social ("Nik Kantar") wrote:

> If you are requesting human attention, demonstrate human effort.

https://tombedor.dev/human-attention-and-human-effort/

Mastodon Feed

slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:

Spot Apple's astroturf front group once and you can't help but find their enshittified fingerprints on everything. Here's Cupertino's favourite sock puppet -- "ACT | The App Association" -- arguing against right-to-repair for smartphones:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/10/28/2024-24563/exemption-to-prohibition-on-circumvention-of-copyright-protection-systems-for-access-control#:~:text=Opponents%20ACT%20%7C%20The%20App%20Association%3B

/cc @owa @pluralistic

Mastodon Feed

glyph ("Glyph") wrote:

RE: https://mastodon.social/@mcc/116902161595783388

excellent high-level summary of what is wrong with the recent wave of “discovery bots”

I don’t believe that this idea is inherently consent-violating or irredeemable, but gosh it sure needs some redeeming before it’s actually a net positive on the network

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
xgranade@wandering.shop ("Cassandra 🔜 San Francisco (for real!)") wrote:

Self OH: "let me have this, it's my emotional support emotional dysregulation."

Mastodon Feed

kornel ("Kornel") wrote:

I accidentally made a photo of our cats lying *very quickly*

You're free to use the photo as an album cover.
#Caturday

Two cats, flash and motion blur.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by kornel ("Kornel"):
foone@digipres.club ("Alice Averlong🏳️‍⚧️") wrote:

I just had to confirm to my washing machine that I'm over 18

Mastodon Feed

kevinevans@hachyderm.io ("Kevin") wrote:

At the Bainbridge Island Rummage sale this morning and it's crowded!

#kitsap

Crowd of people entering a large rummage sale

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
cmsdengl@mas.to ("David Phd") wrote:

The British are adding panels to the Bayeux Tapestry while its in London

#farage #countbinface #bayeux #tapestry #politics

A cartoon in the style of the Bayeux Tapestry showing Nigel Farage being attacked by a man with a bin on his head. There is a caption in poor Latin "ECCE! NIGELVS FARAGVS AGGREDITVR AB HVMINE CVM CISTERNA SPER CAPITE" describing the scene

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
dogzilla@masto.deluma.biz wrote:

Global EV demand rises again as Europe offsets China, U.S. weakness https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/global-ev-demand-rises-again-europe-offsets-china-us-weakness-2026-07-09/

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
DosFox@tech.lgbt wrote:

I think I just found a 40 year old Easter egg.

I was looking into the Levco Monster Mac, which is an upgrade board for the original Macintosh 128k/512k which adds up to 2mb of ram as well as SCSI.

An interesting feature is that this upgrade doesn't necessarily require Macintosh plus ROMs to work (most expansion cards do, as the original ROMs only work with 512k of ram, and don't have SCSI support).

Fortunately the ROMs for the Levco Monster Mac have been dumped.
https://archive.org/details/levco-monstermac-2mxs-rev-d-proms%5F202505

I reassembled the ROM from the high and low ROM dumps, looked at the resulting binary with a hex editor and there's a nice little greeting for people poking around the ROM 😂

A small screenshot of a hex editor. To the left is the actual hex (good ol' 68000 binary) and to the left is the ASCII representation.  In the ascii you can read the message "Hi guys!"