jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:
In case its unclear, this was very very pre-slop and I think its sort of badass in a horrifying kind of way
jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:
In case its unclear, this was very very pre-slop and I think its sort of badass in a horrifying kind of way
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
It takes management capacity and the ability to direct things in a loose top-down sense (think corporate-level OKRs + delegation) to engineer freedom *from* choice, not just freedom *of* choice.
This is a lesson Linux & friends have never learned, and it's why we are stuck in a Groundhog Day "Year of the Linux Desktop" 25+ years later. Delivering for those who *aren't* (low-level) developers requires abstraction and disciplines that rarely self-organise because they lack free capital.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
Nobody will understand when I say that this is why we're still fighting about ABIs and package managers, but that's the deep truth of the matter.
A useful corollary is that the web is necessary to any liberatory agenda because it elides the low-management-capacity aspects of FOSS in ways that still deliver for users. This is perhaps my second most unpopular take.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
RE: https://cosocial.ca/@mhoye/117201955863661640
Back in college I was pretty heavily involved in the local LUG (organised events, President for a while, etc.), and it didn't take more than a few year's experience to teach me that the politics of the Free Software viewpoint might have been morally right, but were practically useless in the liberatory sense. Unless FOSS stocked away enough capital to liberate *itself*, it could never do enough to build the sort of high-level managerial systems that would allow it to compete under capitalism.
rust@social.rust-lang.org ("Rust Language") wrote:
Rustup 1.29.1 has been released! 🦀
See the blog post for all the changes to rustup: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/09/01/Rustup-1.29.1/
Boosted by krig@goto.liten.app:
kramo@chaos.social ("Laura Kramolis") wrote:
Every day, it becomes clearer that literally anything good we can do is in spite of economic circumstances. Corporatist fascists have all the money, but that’s all they have. This is why they’re trying to fill the gaping hole in their hearts with generative AI. What money won’t buy them is real human connections. Make art, make love, help others, and you’ll have lived a better life than they did. In the end, we’re richer.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
I'll say this for Proxmox: it's as Linux as you want it to be.
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
That sense of accomplishment when you unfsck LXC's you monumentally screwed up and return everything to exactly the way it was without obvious scars, modulo the downtime and harrowing, round-the-world debugging of the VM host failing to boot.
/ht @phae who thought of a clever way back from a dead server
slightlyoff@toot.cafe ("Alex Russell") wrote:
RE: https://toot.cafe/@slightlyoff/117196228412775225
WHY ARE DEMS LIKE THIS?!!?!
https://newrepublic.com/post/215016/two-house-democrats-vote-save-republican-agenda
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers 🕷") wrote:
A hopelessly stupid website for stupid people. They're gonna be raking in the cash!
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/09/02/unjected/
fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:
Oh, Americans don't have culture? Then what do you call PTSD and Oreos?
baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:
“I’m not angry; I’m disappointed” is basically my whole online personality these days 😝
Boosted by jwz:
picandocodigo@mastodon.online ("Fernando Briano") wrote:
Just got these delivered. Thank you @chrislowis so much for printing and sending them for free! And thanks @jwz for the original design. Can't wait to hand these out whenever someone tells me "I only use AI for...", etc.
Boosted by pixxl:
mhoye@cosocial.ca wrote:
I wish I'd internalized maybe 20 years earlier that the only way free software could be liberatory, rather than merely, selfishly libertarian, is if the goals became not to secure our own freedoms, but to grant and guarantee them for other people. Today almost nobody can change the software they use, and as a measurable fact almost nobody who can the change software the use does. But even so: having those choices matters; securing the fact of them, evangelizing and defending that fact, matters.
Boosted by pixxl:
gabrielesvelto@mas.to ("Gabriele Svelto") wrote:
Happy "Oracle has lost more than 60% of its value since the peak one year ago" to all those who celebrate
Boosted by pixxl:
diz@awful.systems wrote:
Fucking knew it. I follow some idiot slopper thread and they are all always going on about their prompting and absolutely none of them ever even considered measuring the effects.
Having actually done optimizations including professionally once upon a time, its so ridiculous to see people thinking they optimize a stochastic process. It is just gambling.
Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof: :Nonbinary:"):
wizbean@tech.lgbt ("wiztina :blobcatwitch:") wrote:
We can build robots in any shape, with any number of motor limbs. They are very useful in industry environments, where they can perform various specialized tasks. The function of a robot is what it does.
The only reason to build them humanoid, with generalized skills and dexterity, is to displace humans. That's the function of humanoid robots. That's why capitalists want them. To get rid of us.
Boosted by pixxl:
lrhodes@merveilles.town ("⁂ L. Rhodes") wrote:
That libertarian thesis also accounts for some FOSS luminaries' counterintuitive embrace of vibecoding, which seems so antithetical to so many of the named values that ostensibly animate the scene. The libertarian ideal can be characterized as "freedom from other people," and that's the emotional (if not factual) affect one gets from generative AI — that you can build whatever you need without relying on anyone else.
Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof: :Nonbinary:"):
danmccullough@ecoevo.social ("Dan McCullough") wrote:
Someone needs a complaint box.
Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof: :Nonbinary:"):
danmccullough@ecoevo.social ("Dan McCullough") wrote:
@peachfront The worst 4 words in the whole birb language. 🤣
Boosted by neatnik@social.lol ("Neatnik :prami:"):
skippy@social.lol wrote:
I wrote to @1password expressing my disappointment with their funding of Omacom. They provided me the standard corporate response, to which I replied.
Boosted by EmilyEnough@hachyderm.io ("Emily 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️"):
Damselfly@blackqueer.life ("Not Your Damsel") wrote:
Destroy capitalism.
In this economy?
Boosted by dysfun@treehouse.systems ("gaytabase"):
fesshole ("Fesshole 🧻") wrote:
A woman was rude to me on the train today, so I Googled the book she was reading and told her who the murderer was.
Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
davebauerart ("Dave bauer") wrote:
Hey anyone who knows of a job in NYC for a kid with a BA in fine arts and experience as a bartender, let me know.
db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:
men will do anything to avoid writing CSS like a normal person
https://stylexjs.com/docs/learn
what an absolute abomination
pzmyers@freethought.online ("pzmyers 🕷") wrote:
Wisconsin billionaires. The worst.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/09/02/the-bad-guys-have-faces/
Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
amydiehl@mstdn.social ("Amy Diehl, Ph.D.") wrote:
Girls Gone Bible hosts speak of burnout w/o addressing the economic forces behind their generation’s exhaustion and despair. They detail mental health struggles, but don't interrogate the institutional roadblocks women face when they try to get help.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/01/girls-gone-bible-podcast-young-women-christianity
Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
pluralistic@mamot.fr ("Cory Doctorow") wrote:
536 words on “Once Is Enemy Action,” a science fiction novel about the origins of modern technofascism. (11380 words total) #dailywords
Boosted by neatnik@social.lol ("Neatnik :prami:"):
jbz@indieweb.social wrote:
Tales o’ Tech: Suffering Fools - Jeffrey Zeldman Presents
https://zeldman.com/2026/09/01/tales-o-tech-suffering-fools/