Mastodon Feed: Posts

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by andrewnez ("Andrew Nesbitt"):
kgz@chaos.social wrote:

There's a FOSDEM smell in the air, the season is starting: submit your devroom proposals now:

https://fosdem.org/2027/news/call-for-devrooms/

#fosdem

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿"):
vale@fedi.vale.rocks ("Vale") wrote:

Sometimes you look at an old HTML document and see some weird tags and snippets from bygone eras.

I’ve compiled many legacy HTML bits I’ve noticed and documented what they were and why there were present. Many of them are rather obscure.

Satisfy your curiosity: https://vale.rocks/posts/html-relics

#WebDev #HTML

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

I am so fucking excited for this

Fielder said that his own inability to get a firm grip on what he was witnessing became one of the forces driving the project. “We’re all smart and we’re really working at the top of our intelligence,” he recalled thinking as he and the crew tried to make sense of their time with Holmes and Evans. “Why can’t we make sense of what’s happening in this house?”

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

The rehearsal season 1 was filmed sometime starting in 2019 and released in 2022. Nathan fielder spent 2 years learning to get his commercial pilot's license for the second season.

So he was doing a the rehearsal on Elizabeth Holmes the whole time he was doing the second season. This is what happens when you give extremely weird motherfuckers with special skills a lot of time and resources.

https://archive.is/hKfZ2

The movie begins 34 days before Holmes is due to report to federal prison, with Fielder, Oppenheim and a small crew given extraordinary access to her life with her partner, Billy Evans, and their young children. Holmes and Evans embrace what they call “radical transparency,” opening their home to the cameras in hopes of convincing the filmmakers — and eventually the world — that the public has fundamentally misunderstood her.

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

Surely the light of human consciousness will evolve beyond its biological bounds and create an interstellar information superspecies thanks to a process whose incentives include "minmaxing token output on benchmarks so hard the model defaults to minified python"

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

Its cool how the arrival of AGI means that for some reason I am seeing a lot of minified python with lots of eval and compile calls in it

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
JenMsft ("Jen Gentleman") wrote:

It turns out, ICQ was foretelling the future of social media when they associated the sound of incoming messages with "uh oh"

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
mttaggart@infosec.exchange ("Taggart :ifin:") wrote:

Machine speed is a con and we don't have to buy it.

https://taggart-tech.com/speed/

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
Secitup@infosec.exchange ("Lady Secitup") wrote:

I wrote a thing, please read.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-have-problems-apparently-jessica-hebenstreit-pq2hc/

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by neatnik@social.lol ("Neatnik :prami:"):
mhoye@cosocial.ca wrote:

My fellow aging white men I am begging you to understand that when you are saying out loud that things were better back when you lived in comfortable ignorance, all anyone else can hear is that you are definitely still doing that.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:"):
heyheymomo@socel.net wrote:

I set up a new commission listing on my ko-fi where you can request a custom fully personalised heyheymomo comic!

https://ko-fi.com/c/708dad3f77

drawn image of momo showing off a comic (just four colored blocks on a white paper in my overly stylised drawing style) to forg. He says 'look' and forg goes 'cool!'. Text above reads 'request a custom comic!'

Mastodon Feed

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

mov-reg-64-imm32 is the call, taking those two parameters. for simplicity, we picked an example where they're both constants.

then ~ buffer length is a comment about what this particular call is for, which is relevant to a person reading the code the call is lexically contained in, so we will probably want to preserve that one.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
masukomi@connectified.com wrote:

@catsalad Wait. You know what your passwords are?!

🤔 The only passwords I know are the pin codes for my glass slabs, and the master password for my password manager.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
zak@infosec.exchange ("Zak") wrote:

@catsalad Ugh dang. One sec.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
catsalad@infosec.exchange ("Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)") wrote:

IMPORTANT MASTODON PASSWORD SECURITY/PRIVACY ISSUE…
⁠----

For everyone:

If you are using the same password for Mastodon that I use, CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD NOW.

It's my password, and I call dibs...

Hint: h*****2

Mastodon Feed

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

so, here's an example of a call to this word (from a snippet of code elsewhere that we have handy)

1 :rdx mov-reg64-imm32 ~ buffer length

we'll go through that piece by piece.

1 is an integer literal.

:rdx is a word that evaluates to a pointer to itself, which is a convention we borrowed from Common Lisp that lets us make ad-hoc enums that can be mixed and matched depending on how they're needed.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:"):
BathysphereHat@mastodon.online ("Rabbit Cohen") wrote:

Huh, a search for "best video game for pain management" turned up a resource from the charity Child's Play that some of you might find useful. https://assets.childsplaycharity.org/docs/gameguide.pdf

Mastodon Feed

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

the body of the word itself is a bunch of stack manipulation and some calls to words that actually produce output. the calls to pack8 and pack32 are producing low-level output of integer values having certain byte sizes.

the calls to rex-w and addressing-reg-64 are using helper words defined elsewhere in this same file; they do things that are specific to Intel machine code, but shared by many instructions.

Mastodon Feed

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

importantly, we don't actually want that comment in the hex dump, it wouldn't be useful there. it's an instruction for readers who are maintaining the implementation of mov-reg64-imm32, it doesn't need to be shown on every call to it.

Mastodon Feed

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

the challenge with the hex transform is finding meaningful comments to put into the compiled code. since we implemented amd64 assembly within Evocation, we have the luxury of tweaking how the assembly words are implemented. for example, here's one:

~ (output point, immediate value, register -- output point)
: mov-reg64-imm32
 3roll rex-w 0xC7 pack8 swap
 0 swap addressing-reg64
 swap pack32 ;

Mastodon Feed

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

(we've already written the comment-stripping hex-to-binary converter, which is short enough that it's easy to audit even in its binary form)

Mastodon Feed

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

so we've got the core abstractions for the hex transform's special comment syntax in our head now

as a refresher, Evocation is our Forth compiler. it is already self-hosting; we are adding a feature we call the hex transform which goes a step further, removing most of its dependence on a binary executable as part of its build process, by compiling itself into a commented hex dump which can be audited by hand.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
chadmccullough@bsd.cafe ("Chad McCullough") wrote:

It really kind of angers me when I see Republicans celebrating Labor Day here in the US.

A person in our neighborhood who voted for Trump, placed two American flags in her yard with a "Happy Labor Day" sign. It took everything in me not to go and have a conversation with her about it.

Mastodon Feed

jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

from Wikipedia:

"While the term progressivism represents a range of diverse political pressure groups, not always united, progressives rejected social Darwinism, believing that the problems society faced, such as class warfare, greed, poverty, racism and violence, could best be addressed by providing good education, a safe environment, and an efficient workplace. Progressives lived mainly in the cities, were college educated, and believed in a strong central government."

it is a century later now. as a society, we seem to have lost our way.

Mastodon Feed

jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein") wrote:

RE: https://mastodon.laurenweinstein.org/@lauren/117232702510765223

#HeadDesk #HeadDesk #HeadDesk

WTF salary is this clown getting, and why?

[insert sarcasm emoji here]

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jsonstein@masto.deoan.org ("Jeff Sonstein"):
wwu@social.wikiworkersunited.org ("Wiki Workers United") wrote:

This US Labor Day, we're celebrating our NLRB election landslide win ✊
We're proud of this milestone and our strong, growing union. Excited for what's next as we work to make the Wikimedia Foundation the best workplace it can be for everyone across our global workforce. Swipe through for Chaotic Enby's full quote, one of 2,000 volunteers who stood with us along the way.

[1] Personal statement to WWU from Chaotic Enby, September 3, 2026

#unionneeded #solidarity

[Community Citation [030]. US Labor Day Edition "Wikipedia has often been described as the ‘last good place on the Internet,’ staying free and open at a time when so many other sites decay from corporate greed. Often credited to its volunteer community alone, this couldn't have happened without the tireless work of Wikimedia Foundation staff."  – Chaotic Enby, Wikipedia editor since 2021 with over 52,000 global edits Reference: 1 Personal statement to WWU, September 3, 2026. Wiki Workers United/CWA. [union needed]. Solidarity Forever. Healthy Institutions Share Power.]6
[Community Citation [030]. US Labor Day Edition "Today, their US branch celebrates a well-deserved victory, and I am proud to be among the thousands of volunteer editors supporting the largest cause across the history of the English Wikipedia community. It is our responsibility to hold the Foundation behind Wikipedia's continued existence responsible to embody the same values we fight for, namely, a fair and democratic internet." – Chaotic Enby, Wikipedia editor since 2021 with over 52,000 global edits Reference: 1 Personal statement to WWU, September 3, 2026. Wiki Workers United/CWA. [union needed]. Solidarity Forever. Healthy Institutions Share Power.]7

Mastodon Feed

fromjason ("fromjason.xyz ❤️ 💻 ✍️ 🥐 🇵🇷") wrote:

AOC saying "Woke 1 was crazy" left a sour taste in my mouth.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by cstanhope@social.coop ("Your weary 'net denizen"):
lislegaard@sonomu.club ("Kristoffer Lislegaard") wrote:

what is your main / favorite / wish use for a computer?

like, in these crazy manipulated surveiled times, i end up with the question: what is the computer good for, for you?

because that also sort of gives the follow up question, that is: how much computer do you need to be able to do that task?

feel free to answer long or short, one or many things.

#computer #tech #philosophy #technology

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jwz:
Viss wrote:

see, here's the thing.
if you want twitter to die, you have to starve it of oxygen.

stuff like nitter and xcancel may make you feel like you have the moral high ground because 'you arent actually going to twitter' but the reality is that despite you proxying your request through an intermediary, you are still going to twitter.

and twitter counts every hit, every read, every request - even if its proxied - as traffic and in some cases active user count.

and MAU is how they measure success

Mastodon Feed

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

looking at it again today, things feel clearer. we stubbed out the "messy" but more-direct approach, and we've seen what its very rough output would look like and what work would be needed to make it solid, and it feels wrong. we're going with the other approach, the special comment syntax at the point where output-generating words are defined.