Mastodon Feed: Posts

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
aby@aus.social ("Aby, full of whimsy and rage") wrote:

I'm so tired of seeing men make comments that are literally just a rewording of the original post written by someone who isn't a man.

Just stop doing this.

Not only isn't it necessary, but it pushes the harmful idea that nothing is valid unless it's rubber-stamped by a man's explanation of it.

_____
* inb4 - I know there's going to be some man who will think it's humorous to do that on this post—it's not funny. Don't be that guy.

#men #sex #mansplaining #ToxicMasculinity #gaslighting #misogyny #patriarchy

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:"):
Brynndylow@chatty.frogawampus.co.uk ("Brynnbo The FrogMxstress") wrote:

Not bad for a first try :HeartIntersex: :BlobHajMlem:

#BrynnSews

An intersex flag Seaflap (stingray) plushie. They're sunshine yellow with two purple rings, one on each wing. They have a white belly.
A closeup of the wing, showing the purple ring appliqué that's been zigzag stitched on.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
healyn@normal.style wrote:

I know a lot of filmmakers have been depressingly open to generative AI over the past year, so in case you missed this recent Werner Herzog quote:

“I immediately said, ‘You will fail. It is such a stupid idea. It’s phenomenally, abysmally stupid. I will not take part in it.'” Herzog, in Venice along with his typically idiosyncratic new film Bucking Fastard starring Kate and Rooney Mara, was referring to About A Hero, a AI-generated “pseudo-documentary” from filmmaker Piotr Winiewicz. The film, screened at 2024’s IDFA documentary festival, describes its Herzog-centric narrative as being “based on a script written by an AI trained on Herzog’s collected works.” The actual Herzog, however, has a decidedly different take on the project.  “He wanted me to explain things and have my voice in it,” Herzog told interviewer Ryan Lattanzio. “I said, ‘You are alone. There’s such a thing as free speech, which I respect. So go ahead and fail.’ And it is a failure, period.”

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason"):
oli@social.tchncs.de ("Oli") wrote:

"Meanwhile, what’s really existential is AI powering autonomous weapons, killing machines, that are actually being used in warfare. The climate catastrophe is a real thing that could be exacerbated by what these tech companies are building. Bosses are using AI as an excuse to get rid of their pesky workers. This machine-god narrative is, in my opinion, meant to distract us from these."

Yes, a thousand times this. There is no AGI or SkyNet lurking around the corner.

https://www.wired.com/story/one-of-ais-fiercest-critics-says-all-the-doom-talk-is-meant-to-distract-us/

Mastodon Feed

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

“Power grab”

https://tante.cc/2026/09/11/power-grab/

> DHH is using his position and his influence to accumulate donations that he then can distribute to projects that align with his fascist worldview and ambitions. And in a time where many important projects and infrastructures are strapped for cash running just on the goodwill of a handful of people that is increasingly dangerous.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by krig@goto.liten.app:
datarama@hachyderm.io wrote:

I don't know if the final line - "You are somebody now" - of DHH's "Omarchy Doctrine" is *intended* to have this connotation, but the first thing that popped into my mind is the final stanza of a poem written by the Danish resistance fighter Morten Nielsen, published posthumously in 1945. Here is my (poor, non-rhyming) translation. I've taken the liberty of capitalizing the interesting bit.

Fast bright voices, whirling into the blue
you were miserable, Fatty, but we couldn't understand
Sweaty and fat and stupid, Hell leapt forth
to knock over you and your bike; we stood around laughing.

You sat on the front bench - never cry, just stare, stare, stare
when a frightened and funny substitute asks you to add two and two
middle school subs saved a fraying discipline
by turning it all against you, who defenselessly became a joke.

When springtime came, for us who were 15 years old
and the trees stood shining over the girls' soft hair
and you came, cautiously and sincerely,
the one who laughed the loudest of us, was her it was all about.

Now revenge is yours! You wear shoulder strap and jackboots
you raise your arm, a light shines in your pale blue eyes
for a human being can take hatred, mockery and threats, but never - no, never! - being laughed at.

YOU ARE SOMEBODY NOW, Fatty, man and party member.
And should we go to the wall one day, your hand will be ready
Ready to smash your brass knuckles into my mouth when you strike.
And now you're out to kill, Fatty, all the cruel years.

(I think every Danish schoolkid still learns it. DHH is almost exactly my age, so he certainly did.)

Mastodon Feed

baldur@toot.cafe ("Baldur Bjarnason") wrote:

“AGI Benchmarks: Eugenic Origins — by Valerie Veatch – Pivot to AI”

https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/09/11/agi-benchmarks-eugenic-origins-by-valerie-veatch/

> This was the beginning of the relentless use of white-nationalist, white-supremecist, eugenicist definitions of ‘intelligence’ deployed by the computer sciences to define what eventual machine ‘general intelligence’ might look like.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by jwz:
gedankenstuecke@scholar.social ("Bastian Greshake Tzovaras") wrote:

I still lurk on the r/London subreddit and came across this hilarious piece of activist art which turns a bin into a "smart glasses amnesty bin" that apparently is just across the Ray Ban store. 💅

https://www.reddit.com/r/london/comments/1wdqum6/outside%5Fray%5Fban%5Fcovent%5Fgarden/

#pervertglasses

A bin with some ad busting layover stuck to it. Under the ray ban and Meta logo it reads "smart glasses amnesty bin" next to a pictogram of a person throwing the glasses into a bin.  Further text reads: Wearing hidden camera glasses massively increases the likelihood of people thinking you're a nonce DROP THEM IN AND WALK AWAY WITH WHAT'S LEFT OF YOUR DIGNITY

Mastodon Feed

db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:

penning an RSS-only post, make sure to subscribe :)

https://dbushell.com/subscribe/

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:"):
siderea@universeodon.com ("Siderea, Sibylla Bostoniensis") wrote:

RE: https://aoir.social/@rwg/117250266480905624

I've been hearing a lot of people say of late that the web sucks now because you can't find anything by searching, because all that comes up is AI slop.

This is true, and enormously frustrating. But make no mistake: when you search on things and can't find them, that's not the web sucking per se. That's SEARCH sucking.

1/n

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:"):
brianbilston@mastodon.online ("Brian Bilston") wrote:

Today’s poem is called ‘You Can’t Judge a Book’.

You Can’t Judge a Book   you can’t judge a book
by its cover 
but neither can
you cover a judge
with a book unless the book
is a foldy-out one
with a map or something Brian Bilston

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:"):
OurLostArcade ("Our Lost Arcade - The History") wrote:

Untitled, Goose Game.

Not coin-operated, but too good to not share.

A carnival style rolling ball game featuring a goose that players threw balls into to score points. https://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/240446302_rare-british-1940s-1950s-goose-roll-a-ball-game-tilburg-north-brabant/

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by brib@bribstodon.xyz ("brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:"):
Billthoo@mastodon.art wrote:

Dance
Ink

#Art
#Ink

Ink sketch of a dancer.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
ck@chaos.social wrote:

@soatok @charlotte

Waiting for Matthew to pop up to exclaim in a most handwavery fashion how this is totally not a problem and that matrix needs more money.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker"):
lucky@mastodon.nz ("Lucky ✨") wrote:

the French titles for Pokemon Winds and Pokemon Waves are making me laugh like an idiot. me when i'm posting about my virtual critters but i'm a little toxic about it

Pokemon Vents
Pokemon Vagues

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)"):
darkuncle@infosec.exchange ("Scott Francis") wrote:

Put another way: if you get the answer without the learning process, there’s nothing there for you to leverage when tackling future problems

Mastodon Feed

soatok@furry.engineer ("Soatok Dreamseeker") wrote:

The V8 JavaScript Runtime Undermined My Constant-Time JavaScript Library

Six years ago, I wrote a blog post titled Soatok's Guide to Side-Channel Attacks in which I discussed the general topic of side-channels in cryptographic applications, and how to avoid them, with example code in PHP....

http://soatok.blog/2026/09/12/the-v8-javascript-runtime-undermined-my-constant-time-javascript-library/

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

Dog if Claude code worked as well as how they say Claude code works then they would have just posted a fully generated custom world simulating simcity game that simulates behaviors across the entire lifespan of a worker. They have the fucking compute for baking a simulation like that but they only use it for consumer word generators instead of anything cool

Mastodon Feed

brennan@social.lol ("Brennan Kenneth Brown") wrote:

It's Christlike to Love Immigrants and Transfolk

https://brennan.day/its-christlike-to-love-immigrants-and-transfolk/

#religion #christianity #socialjustice #theology

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

The website is misleading in a way is skillful and subtle - the way you would think things would work is that the simulation actually worked at the task level, like actually having a mixture of tasks modeled within a worker. Thats a very different kind of model than the macro model they've done here. The thing in the paper is a lot more like "let's construct an equation that always goes up" than "let's simulate what the world could work like and observe the results"

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)"):
tillybridges ("Tilly Bridges") wrote:

if you won’t listen to me, maybe you’ll listen to Lilly Wachowski

because if you actually care about trans people

you gotta drop Harry Potter

https://variety.com/2026/tv/features/lilly-wachowski-jk-rowling-harry-potter-trans-the-matrix-1236858104/

There is a big "Harry Potter" series coming out on HBO soon and there are many people opposed to it because of J.K. Rowling's transphobia. She is funding trans genocide. J.K. Rowling funds trans genocide, full stop. So, if you support "Harry Potter," you're supporting trans genocide. The money that goes into you enjoying these products, a portion of that money goes to J.K. Rowling and that money goes into her funding anti-trans legislation all over the world. In the same way that if you are against Elon Musk, you boycott or don't buy Tesla; and if you're against global warming/climate change, you try not to buy as much gas, you try to mitigate your use of these products. It's simple math. So, your enjoyment of these shows, and continued support of these shows, is supporting my eradication.

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by glyph ("Glyph"):
aud@spectre.asta.lgbt (":: Asta :: [New Server]") wrote:

alright, so, I feel like probably switching to Twisted is going to start paying off in a big way here soon (other than the simplicity of using Klein and being able to integrate existing `asyncio` stuff into) because I wasn't quite sure how I was going to handle scheduling and doing backup work (adding scraped results to the database, etc)

aaaand yeah, it looks easy as fuck: https://docs.twisted.org/en/latest/core/howto/time.html

mostly I just need background tasks to handle updating the database and *potentially* checking for new things and firing off one-off tasks and it seems those are both built right in. niiiiice.

Mastodon Feed

ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)") wrote:

"it's inevitable! you have no choice, so get used to it!"

"also it's very fragile and would immediately be destroyed if it had to follow even the simplest safety rules!"

well that sounds very well-reasoned and impossible to argue with /s

Mastodon Feed

Boosted by ireneista@irenes.space ("Irenes (many)"):
d6@merveilles.town ("∴ esoterik ∴") wrote:

"'Vibe coding?' No, you mishread me. I said I'm really into 'scribe coding' these days. I get a bunch of physical reference books, write the first draft of my programs with pen and ink, and generally try to create the most beautiful, compact, illuminated software possible."

Mastodon Feed

db@social.lol ("David Bushell 🪿") wrote:

been a while since I was out running to see the sunrise! 🏃

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

Oh sure yeah theres no reason to believe that "AI" might differ from other forms of automation in the number of new tasks have to be done compared to the automation of 1987-2017

The reinstatement ratio 𝜌 is the mass of new labor tasks created per unit of tasks automated. In the decomposition of Acemoglu and Restrepo (2019), new tasks roughly kept pace with automated ones over 1947–87 and ran at about half of them over 1987–2017. The modest scenario’s 0.5 is thus similar to recent history. The extreme scenario’s 0 assumes that AI does not create any new tasks for humans to perform.

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

You had better fucking believe that citation of "1.6x productivity gain estimated by conversations with Claude" is referencing when anthropic asked Claude to estimate how long each task that someone used Claude for would take without Claude. You know, the same frontier LLM that has a sense of time that makes it routinely say things like adding an api endpoint will take months, and is constantly telling me to go to bed in the middle of the day

The productivity gain per instance starts at 0.30–0.45 in logs, reflecting estimates from field trials and frontier firms (Brynjolfsson et al., 2025; Huang et al., 2025), about a quarter of the gain of 1.6 estimated from conversations with Claude (Tamkin and McCrory, 2025). The scenarios also differ in whether that gap closes. In the modest scenario, the productivity gain per task is fixed, whereas in the extreme scenario it reaches 0.80 by 2030.

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

"Our capital pricing term leans towards a value that means it can more or less be built on demand because compute is easy to build and we can build all the compute capacity we need for a given period with a two year lag"

We set the elasticity of capital supply at 𝜀 = 3, which is higher than five years of saving at historical rates would imply. We lean toward a relatively high value because the capital that performs automated cognitive work is disproportionately compute, financed in a world market and built in a year or two

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

(The ceiling of the maximum tasks that can be done by AI with perfect substition is explicitly claimed as "all the cognitive tasks" which they claim is 62.4% because... That's the proportion of people who work in the "cognitive professions" )

Mastodon Feed

jonny@neuromatch.social ("jonny (nonvenomous)") wrote:

So their moderate scenario assumes 30% of all tasks can be done by AI by 2030, 40% of those will be done by AI, with 50/50 automation/augmentation.

So the underlying claim they are making is that within 3 and a quarter years, AI will be doing 12% of everything. Not just what the call "cognitive tasks," all tasks period.